LRA 145(4) Archives - GilesFiles

Conduct worthy of dismissal: Inappropriate language?

by GilesFiles | Mar 24, 2026 | 2020 onwards, Agriculture, Appeals - leave, Awards -s145 see also Sidumo, Balancing interests, Causes and defences, Compensation or damages, Conduct unbecoming, Contractual breach, Costs, Costs not awarded, Courts, Declaratory, Disallowed, GN Moshoana, Insolence and disrespect, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Appeal Court, Labour Relations, LAC judges, Lawfulness & fairness, Legal Practice, Legislation, LRA 08a: 185-197B Dismissal, LRA 193, LRA 194, LRA 1995, Orders, Parties, Private enterprises, Progressive, Protect not punish, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Specific performance, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Statutory, Termination (LRL 8), Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Bargaining council agreement: Allowing employer exemptions

by GilesFiles | Apr 9, 2025 | 2020 onwards, AB - Law generally, AB1 - Fairness principle or concept, Applications, Bargaining councils, Causes and defences, Collective Bargaining (LRL 5), Common law, Consumer protection, Courts, Declaratory, Free and fair, granted, Insights, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Legislation, LRA 03: 11-63 Bargain, LRA 07: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 1995, Management, Markets in SA, Objective - correctness, Orders, Organisations (LRL 4), Parties, Pay differentials, Private enterprises, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sean Snyman, Sectors, Selected judges, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Statutory, Topics, Transport & communication, Work Science Institute | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Interpreting collective agreement: Leave provision misunderstood

by GilesFiles | Jan 9, 2025 | 2020 onwards, Causes and defences, Central, Contractual breach, Courts, Declaratory, Disputes: right or interest, Government, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Legislation, LRA 07: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 1995, LRA D: 151-166 LC, Objective - correctness, Orders, Parties, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, State Owned Enterprises, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Statutory, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Rescinding arbiter ruling: Serious error – unreasonable outcome

by GilesFiles | Nov 20, 2024 | 2020 onwards, Applications, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Central, Courts, Declaratory, Evidence & onus, General, Government, Granted, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Legislation, LRA 07: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 144 and 165 rescissions, LRA 1995, LRA C: 133-150 CCMA, MZN Lallie, Objective - correctness, Orders, Parties, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Selected judges, State organs, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Reviving contract considered: Judicial direction or order?

by GilesFiles | Nov 18, 2024 | 2020 onwards, AH - Labour Legislation & Rules, AH02a - LC rules current, Allowed, André van Niekerk, Appeals, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Central, Courts, Government, Insights, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Appeal Court, Labour Relations, LAC judges, LC Rules-new, LC-Practice Manual, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Legislation, LRA 1995, Orders, Parties, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Selected judges, State Owned Enterprises, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Promotion defined and assessed: Pay or grade progression?

by GilesFiles | Mar 1, 2024 | 2020 onwards, AF - Internal equity external parity, Awards -s145 see also Sidumo, Causes and defences, Central, Contractual breach, Costs, Courts, Declaratory, Discrimination (LRL 11), False assumptions, Government, Insights, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Legislation, LRA 08b: 185-186(2) Practices, LRA 1995, Management, Orders, Parties, Pay differentials, Pay progression, Performance, Policies - all, Promotion or demotion, Protect not punish, Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Scarce skills allowances, Sean Snyman, Sectors, Selected judges, Seven occupational levels, Sidumo - see also awards s 145, State organs, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Statutory, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Tag: LRA 145(4)

Conduct worthy of dismissal: Inappropriate language?

Bargaining council agreement: Allowing employer exemptions

Interpreting collective agreement: Leave provision misunderstood

Rescinding arbiter ruling: Serious error – unreasonable outcome

Reviving contract considered: Judicial direction or order?

Promotion defined and assessed: Pay or grade progression?