Gender discrimination Archives

Rescinding arbiter ruling: Serious error – unreasonable outcome

by GilesFiles | Nov 20, 2024 | 2020 onwards, Applications, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Central, Courts, Declaratory, Evidence & onus, General, Government, Granted, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Legislation, LRA 07: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 144 and 165 rescissions, LRA 1995, LRA C: 133-150 CCMA, MZN Lallie, Objective - correctness, Orders, Parties, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Selected judges, State organs, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Differentiation not discrimination: Unrelated to race or gender

by GilesFiles | Nov 24, 2023 | 2020 onwards, AF - Internal equity external parity, Applications, Causes and defences, Central, Courts, Declaratory, Differentiation not discrimination, EEA Chpt II ss 5-11, EEA Chpt VI 53-65, Employ Equity (LRL 12), Equal pay and value, Government, HC Uniform, Insights, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, LC Rules-old, Legal Practice, Legislation, LRA 07: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 1995, Management, MZN Lallie, Orders, Parties, Pay differentials, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Selected judges, State Owned Enterprises, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Statutory, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Workplace bullying considered: Favouring males

by GilesFiles | May 6, 2022 | Causes and defences, CCMA awards, Conduct & capacity, Contractual breach, Costs, Costs awarded, Courts, Declaratory, Evidence & onus, Harass & bully, Insights, Interpretation etc, Judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, LRA 07: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 08a: 185-197B Dismissal, LRA 1995, Management, Orders, Parties, Performance, Policies - all, Risks, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Statutory, Termination (LRL 8), Topics, Trust & confidence, Universities and schools | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Gender discrimination considered: Female comparator

by GilesFiles | Sep 9, 2020 | AF - Internal equity external parity, CCMA awards, Courts, EEA 1998, EEA 7 Factors, EEA Chpt II ss 5-11, EEA Chpt V ss 34-52, Employ Equity (LRL 12), Equal pay and value, Evidence & onus, Government, Insights, Judges, Just and equitable relief, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Municipal, Orders, Parties, Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Topics, Work Science Institute | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Sexual orientation discrimination: Unlawful labour practice

by GilesFiles | Jun 15, 2020 | AUD, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Courts, Dignity equality freedom, Discrimination (LRL 11), Labour Relations, Legislation, Statutory, Termination (LRL 8), Topics | 0 |

Bostock v. Clayton County Whilst the doctrine of ’employment at will’ ( see also ‘just because’) prevails in the USA (and in some parts of Canada) it is an unlawful labour practice in terms of the Civil...

Blatant gender discrimination: Automatically unfair

by GilesFiles | Oct 18, 2016 | 2016, Anton Steenkamp, AUD, Conduct - gross, Conduct & capacity, Courts, Deceased judges, Discrimination (LRL 11), Judges, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, LRA 194, Objective - correctness, Protect not punish, Risks, Termination (LRL 8), Trust & confidence, Zero tolerance | 0 |

The LC had no hesitation in awarding maximum compensation and severance pay for 28 dismissed female security guards. They were ‘deployed’ at Metrorail who ‘demanded’ that female guards be replaced by males. This demand was not...

Alleged gender discrimination: CCMA must conciliate

by GilesFiles | Jul 21, 2016 | 2016, CCMA awards, Courts, Discrimination (LRL 11), EEA 1998, John Murphy, Jurisdiction & powers, Miscellaneous | 1 |

The LAC disallowed the appeal and upheld the order of Tlhotlhalemaje AJ, as he then was, in the LC. The bargaining council did not have the jurisdiction nor power to deal with the dispute concerning differentiation and whether...

Gender discrimination targets: Senior management level

by GilesFiles | Nov 25, 2014 | 2014 and earlier, Courts, Discrimination (LRL 11), EEA 1998, EEA Chpt II ss 5-11, Employ Equity (LRL 12), Judges, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Topics | 0 |

Mgolozeli v Gauteng Department of Finance (JS704/11) [2014] ZALCJHB 466; [2015] 3 BLLR 308; (2015) 36 ILJ 1602; [2015] JOL 32783 (LC) (25 November 2014) per Modise AJ. The Labour Court held that the male applicant has been...

Potential racial discrimination: Including gender

by GilesFiles | Sep 1, 2014 | 2014 and earlier, ConCourt judges, Constitutional Court, Courts, Employ Equity (LRL 12), Equal outcomes, ERelations (LRL 1), Judges | 0 |

Tomorrow at 10.00 the Constitutional Court will deliver its judgment on an application by the South African Police Service (SAPS) for leave to appeal against the judgment and order of the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in...

Gender discrimination

by GilesFiles | Jun 9, 2010 | Discrimination (LRL 11), Employ Equity (LRL 12), Equal outcomes, philosophy / economics | 0 |

She says Citigroup’s bosses told her to alter her attire because her body and her beauty were too much for her cretin male co-workers to take. They could not focus on their work if she was in the vicinity.

Tag: Gender discrimination