Tag: all or nothing

Fair dismissal explained: valid and fair reason

by GilesFiles | Jun 28, 2010 | 2015 and earlier, Balancing interests, BCEA 1997 (LRL 10), Causes and defences, Courts, ILO Conventions, Insights, Interpretation etc, Judges, Labour Relations, Landmark judgments, LRA 1995, MJD Wallis, Notice requirements, SCA judges, Topics, Trust & confidence | 0 |

It is generally understood that the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 [LRA], not the South African common law, determines what a fair procedure is – see Code of Good Practice (conduct and capacity) and sections 189 and 189A...

Read More

Legally prohibited activity: Ruling set aside

by GilesFiles | May 26, 2010 | 2014 and earlier, 2015 and earlier, AB1 - Fairness principle or concept, Allowed, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Compensation or damages, Conduct & capacity, Courts, Declaratory, Deemed, Dennis Davis, Dignity equality freedom, Discrimination (LRL 11), Evidence & onus, False assumptions, ILO Conventions, ILO reports, Insights, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Appeal Court, Labour Relations, LAC judges, Landmark judgments, Lawfulness & fairness, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Legislation, LRA 08a: 185-197B Dismissal, LRA 193, LRA 1995, Management, Objective - correctness, Operation of law, Orders, Parties, Personal services, Private enterprises, Protectable interests, Public policy, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Review tests, Roman Dutch law, Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Statutory, Termination (LRL 8), Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Read More