PAJA 7 Archives - GilesFiles

Appointment rationality examined: Refusal to confirm

by GilesFiles | Apr 11, 2024 | 2020 onwards, Applications, Causes and defences, Costs, Courts, Declaratory, District, Government, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Legislation, Local, LRA 1995, MZN Lallie, Orders, PAJA 2000, Parties, Review tests, Sectors, Selected judges, State organs, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Statutory, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Varying assessment tariff: split decision re condonation

by GilesFiles | Feb 29, 2024 | 2020 onwards, A G Binns-Ward, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Causes and defences, Central, Costs, Courts, Disallowed, Government, High Court, High Court judges, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Legal Practice, Legislation, Orders, Parties, Private enterprises, Public Protector, Sectors, Selected judges, State organs, Statutory, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Inexcusable delayed hearing: Final interdict granted

by GilesFiles | Mar 30, 2023 | 2020 onwards, AB1 - Fairness principle or concept, Applications, Associations/corporates, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Costs, Courts, Declaratory, General, Granted, High Court, High Court judges, Interdicts & rules, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Legal Practice, Orders, Parties, Personal services, Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Statutory, staying proceedings, Topics | 0 |

Dr A v Health Professions Council of SA What should courts do when there is an inexcusable delayed hearing against doctor concerning alleged unprofessional medical conduct? ’84. I also agree that if one considers the...

Withdrawal costs denied: FMF ordered to pay

by GilesFiles | Feb 8, 2023 | 2020 onwards, Applications, Causes and defences, Costs, Courts, Declaratory, High Court, High Court judges, Judges, Legal Practice, Orders, Parties, Personal services, Private enterprises, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Statutory, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Reducing electricity supply: Majority judgment

by GilesFiles | Dec 23, 2022 | 2020 onwards, 2020 onwards, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Central, ConCourt judges, Constitutional Court, Costs, Courts, Disallowed, Government, Interdicts & rules, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Landmark judgments, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Legislation, M Madlanga, Orders, PAJA 2000, Parties, Refused, Review tests, Sectors, State Owned Enterprises, Statutory, Topics | 0 |

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd v Vaal River Development Association (Pty) Ltd With regard to reducing electricity supply and claims made by Eskom about supply how should court deal with issue of interim relief? [307] I am not unmindful...

Reducing electricity supply: Special public importance

by GilesFiles | Dec 23, 2022 | 2020 onwards, 2020 onwards, Allowed, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Central, ConCourt judges, Constitutional Court, Costs, Courts, DN Unterhalter, Government, Interdicts & rules, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Landmark judgments, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Legislation, Orders, Parties, Refused, Review tests, Sectors, State Owned Enterprises, Statutory, Topics | 0 |

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd v Vaal River Development Association (Pty) Ltd With regard to reducing electricity supply when is it in the interests of justice to grant leave to appeal to the constitutional court? “[71] In the...

Supervisory order granted: Serious procedural defects

by GilesFiles | Nov 21, 2022 | 2020 onwards, Absenteeism, Allowed, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Costs, Costs not awarded, Courts, Covid-19 issues, Disputes: right or interest, Evidence & onus, Exceptions/special pleas, Fair procedure, Insights, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Legislation, Management, Orders, PAJA 2000, Parties, Personal services, Policies - all, Review tests, Risks, Roman Dutch law, SCA judges, Sectors, Settlement agreements, Special pleas, State Owned Enterprises, Supreme Court of Appeal, Termination (LRL 8), Topics | 0 |

SA Health Products Regulatory Authority v ACDP Why did a full bench of SCA uphold appeal and decide to set aside a supervisory order granted by the high court? “[23] The appeal must succeed for the three inter-related...

Reviewing senior appointment: Preferred job requirements?

by GilesFiles | Oct 4, 2021 | 2020 onwards, AB1 - Fairness principle or concept, Applications, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Costs, Courts, Dignity equality freedom, Evidence & onus, General, Government, High Court, High Court judges, Insights, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Legislation, LRA 1995, Municipal, Orders, Parties, Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, State organs, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Topics | 0 |

George Municipality v Van Staden The George municipality sought the reviewing and setting aside of the appointment of a senior manager in March 2017 because of a directive from the public protector but the high court declined to...

Interrupting power supply: Attempt to bypass municipality?

by GilesFiles | Oct 12, 2020 | 2020 onwards, Applications, Causes and defences, Central, Contractual breach, Courts, Declaratory, Government, High Court, High Court judges, Interdicts & rules, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Legal Practice, Orders, Parties, Private enterprises, Refused, Sectors, State organs, State Owned Enterprises, Statutory, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Lawful administrative action: HC refuses review application

by GilesFiles | May 4, 2020 | 2020 onwards, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Central, Courts, Declaratory, Fair procedure, Government, HC Uniform, High Court, High Court judges, Judges, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Orders, PAJA 2000, Parties, Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Statutory, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Exhausting internal remedies: Exception under PAJA

by GilesFiles | Jan 17, 2018 | 2018, Associations/corporates, Bill of Rights, Courts, Judges, Legislation, PAJA 2000, Parties, Supreme Court of Appeal, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Tag: PAJA 7