LRA 191(6) Archives - GilesFiles

Interlocutory jurisdictional ruling: Section 191(6) LRA

by GilesFiles | Oct 17, 2025 | AH01a - CCMA rules current, AH09 - LRA, Causes and defences, CCMA awards, Costs, Courts, Disputes: right or interest, Interpretation etc, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Legislation, LRA 1995, Orders, Parties, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Counterclaiming substantial damages: Lawfulness and fairness

by GilesFiles | Sep 13, 2024 | 2020 onwards, Applications, Awards -s145 see also Sidumo, BCEA 1997 (LRL 10), BCEA 77(3) & 77A(e), Causes and defences, Central, Conduct & capacity, Connie Prinsloo, Contractual breach, Costs, Courts, Declaratory, Delict, Evidence & onus, Fair procedure, Fixed-term, Government, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Lawfulness & fairness, Legal Practice, Legislation, LRA 1995, Minute: pre-trial or arb, Objective - correctness, Orders, Parties, Policies - all, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Selected judges, State Owned Enterprises, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Statutory, Termination (LRL 8), Topics, Trust & confidence | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Conduct related dismissals: Opportunity to be heard

by GilesFiles | Nov 15, 2023 | 2020 onwards, 64-77 Strikes, 68 strike unprotected, Applications, Causes and defences, Collective action, Conduct - gross, Conduct & capacity, Costs, Courts, Declaratory, Disputes: right or interest, Fair procedure, GN Moshoana, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Legislation, LRA 07: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 08a: 185-197B Dismissal, LRA 1995, Orders, Parties, Risks, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Selected judges, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Termination (LRL 8), Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Lodging grievance considered: Not automatically unfair

by GilesFiles | Mar 25, 2021 | 2020 onwards, AUD, Causes and defences, Conduct & capacity, Courts, Declaratory, Exceptions/special pleas, GN Moshoana, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, LRA 07: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 08a: 185-197B Dismissal, LRA 1995, Orders, Risks, Special pleas, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Termination (LRL 8), Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Condoning lateness considered: Explanation rejected

by GilesFiles | Aug 7, 2019 | 2019, André van Niekerk, Condonation, Courts, Judges, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Tag: LRA 191(6)

Interlocutory jurisdictional ruling: Section 191(6) LRA

Counterclaiming substantial damages: Lawfulness and fairness

Conduct related dismissals: Opportunity to be heard

Lodging grievance considered: Not automatically unfair

Condoning lateness considered: Explanation rejected