LRA 16 Archives - GilesFiles

Operational requirements termination: Nature of possible claims

by GilesFiles | May 19, 2025 | 2020 onwards, Applications, Balancing interests, BCEA 1997 (LRL 10), BCEA 77(3) & 77A(e), Bumping, Causes and defences, Compensation or damages, Connie Prinsloo, Construction industry, Costs, Courts, Damages, Declaratory, Fair procedure, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Legislation, LRA 08a: 189 and 189A see Termination, LRA 1995, Minute: pre-trial or arb, Operational reasons, Orders, Parties, Private enterprises, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Restructuring, Sectors, Severance pay, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Statutory, Termination (LRL 8), Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Political protest action: Labour court lacks jurisdiction

by GilesFiles | Mar 6, 2024 | 2020 onwards, 64-77 Strikes, 69 Protest action, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Causes and defences, Courts, Declaratory, Disallowed, Interdicts & rules, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Appeal Court, Labour Relations, LAC judges, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Legislation, Logistics, LRA 04: 64-69 Power plays (LRL 6), LRA 1995, Objective - correctness, Orders, Organisations (LRL 4), Parties, Private enterprises, Refused, Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Statutory, Topics, Trade | 0 |

CCI SA (Pty) Ltd v ANC Youth League How to determine jurisdiction and whether trade union or strike action was involved or simply political protest action? “[28] What is different in this matter is that as much as the...

Organisational rights withdrawn: Urgency lacking

by GilesFiles | Mar 14, 2023 | 2020 onwards, Applications, Banks, Causes and defences, Costs, Courts, Declaratory, Edwin Tlhotlhalemaje, Finance, Interpretation etc, Judges, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, LRA 03: 11-63 Bargain, LRA 07: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 1995, LRA D: 151-166 LC, Orders, Organisations (LRL 4), Parties, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Statutory, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Workplace ambit and scope: Place or category?

by GilesFiles | Dec 8, 2022 | 2020 onwards, Causes and defences, Collective Bargaining (LRL 5), Costs, Costs not awarded, Courts, Declaratory, Evidence & onus, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, LRA 03: 11-63 Bargain, LRA 07: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 09: 198-213 General, LRA 1995, LRA D: 151-166 LC, Manufacturing, Objective - correctness, Orders, Parties, Private enterprises, Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Statutory, Topics, Trade | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Tag: LRA 16

Operational requirements termination: Nature of possible claims

Political protest action: Labour court lacks jurisdiction

Organisational rights withdrawn: Urgency lacking

Workplace ambit and scope: Place or category?