Tag: CTI

Collective agreement grading: Adopting TASK grading system

by GilesFiles | May 2, 2024 | 2020 onwards, AF - Internal equity external parity, Allowed, Appeals - leave, Causes and defences, Contractual breach, Costs, Courts, Discrimination (LRL 11), EEA Chpt II ss 5-11, Employ Equity (LRL 12), Evidence & onus, Government, Insights, Interpretation etc, Job evaluation and grading, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Appeal Court, Labour Relations, LAC judges, Legal Practice, Legislation, Local, LRA 07: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 1995, LRA D: 151-166 LC, Management, Objective - correctness, Orders, Parties, Pay differentials, Pay progression, Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, State organs, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Statutory, Topics, Words & phrases | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Read More

Collective agreement explained: CTI (contractual to incumbent)

by GilesFiles | Nov 6, 2015 | 2015, AF - Internal equity external parity, Causes and defences, Collective Bargaining (LRL 5), Common law, Contractual breach, Courts, Equal pay and value, Government, H Rabkin-Naicker, Insights, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, LRA 03: 11-63 Bargain, LRA 1995, Management, Municipal, Parties, Policies - all, Review tests, Sectors, State organs, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Topics, Trade unions, Work Science Institute | 0 |

Imatu v Khoza NO [ (Ekurhuleni MM) (JR534/2013) [2015] ZALCJHB 387 (6 November 2015) unreported per Rabkin-Naicker J. The Labour Court reviewed but refused to set aside an arbitral award concerning the interpretation of a...

Read More