Tag: Uniform Rule 33

Separating legal issues: When inconvenient?

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Read More

Extinctive prescription examined: Mental incapacity

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Read More

Privileged occasion not statement: Defamation proved

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Read More

High court proceedings: Pleadings joinder costs

Hlophe JP v Freedom Under Law    In considering the nature and effect of proceedings in the high court a full bench confirmed that in none of the cited judgments is an affidavit equated to a pleading. “The common thread...

Read More

Discovering restraint documents: Uniform Rule 35 notice

Baard v Allem On appeal a full bench of the high court considered an issue relating to discovering documents concerning a trade restraint and decided that there was no basis to interfere with the discretion exercised by the...

Read More

Developing common law: Paying in instalments?

MEC: Health, Gauteng Provincial Government v PN Developing common law in at least two respects considered by the constitutional court and allowed an appeal and decided that the power to develop the common law arose under...

Read More

Separating legal issues: Leave to appeal refused

Phatshoane Henney Attorneys v Trollip In separating legal issues high court cited authority for deciding that convenience must be demonstrated and sufficient information must be placed before the court to enable it to exercise...

Read More

Malicious proceedings claim: Prescribed cause of action?

Holden v Assmang Ltd SCA interpreted s12(1) of the Prescription Act and confirmed that a debt is only due, owing and payable and a complete cause of action was only acquired when the complaint of gross breach of professional...

Read More

Case management directions: Separation and discovery

Investec Bank Ltd v O’Shea NO High Court discussed case management directions  and stressed that a ruling in terms of Uniform Rule 33(4) should be made by the judge and the legal representatives concerned only after very...

Read More

Parol evidence rule: Remains part of SA law

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Read More
Loading