Harksen v Lane NO test Archives

Changes in organisational structure: Differentiation not discrimination

by GilesFiles | Sep 12, 2023 | AB - Law generally, AF - Internal equity external parity, Applications, Causes and defences, CCMA awards, CCMA members, Courts, Declaratory, Differentiation not discrimination, EEA Chpt II ss 5-11, Employ Equity (LRL 12), Equal pay and value, Evidence & onus, Hospitality, Insights, Interpretation etc, Job evaluation and grading, Judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Legislation, Management, Orders, Parties, Pay differentials, Pay progression, Personal services, Private enterprises, Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Statutory, Topics | 0 |

NP v Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife Do changes in organisational structure present management with opportunity to ensure compliance with equal pay for work of equal value? “[14] Applicant is bound by the characterisation of the...

Recruitment age discrimination: Differentiation justified

by GilesFiles | Mar 19, 2021 | 2020 onwards, Allowed, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Bill of Rights, Central, Courts, Declaratory, Dignity equality freedom, DN Unterhalter, EEA 1998, EEA Chpt II ss 5-11, Employ Equity (LRL 12), Evidence & onus, Exceptions/special pleas, Government, High Court judges, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, Legislation, LRA 07: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 1995, Orders, Parties, SCA judges, Sectors, Special pleas, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Supreme Court of Appeal, Topics | 0 |

SA Navy v Tebeila Institute of Leadership, Education, Governance and Training In allowing the appeal the SCA in dealing with recruitment and alleged upper age discrimination referred to the policy which explains that the defence...

Unfair pay discrimination: Irrational and dignity impugned

by GilesFiles | Oct 22, 2020 | 2020 onwards, AF - Internal equity external parity, Applications, Bill of Rights, Courts, Declaratory, EEA Chpt II ss 5-11, Employ Equity (LRL 12), Equal pay and value, Finance, Insights, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, Legal Practice, LRA 07: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 1995, Orders, Parties, Pay differentials, Pay progression, Private enterprises, Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Topics, Work Science Institute | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Evaluating age discrimination: Employment of reservists

by GilesFiles | Jun 19, 2014 | 2014 and earlier, 2015 and earlier, AB - Law generally, AB1 - Fairness principle or concept, Causes and defences, ConCourt judges, Constitutional Court, Costs, Courts, Edwin Cameron, False assumptions, ILO Convention 111/1958, ILO Conventions, Insights, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Relations, Landmark judgments, Legal Practice, Legislation, LRA 07: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 1995, LRA D: 151-166 LC, Management, Orders, Parties, Policies - all, Resolving disputes (LRL 3), Retirement, Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Tag: Harksen v Lane NO test

Changes in organisational structure: Differentiation not discrimination

Recruitment age discrimination: Differentiation justified

Unfair pay discrimination: Irrational and dignity impugned

Evaluating age discrimination: Employment of reservists