Tag: Uniform Rule 36

Expert evidence considered: Requirements and duties

by | Jul 31, 2020 | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 0 |

A M v MEC Health, Western Cape Importantly the SCA has provided guidance and considered expert evidence and stressed that since 1963, when Rule 36(9) was changed,  there have been changes in how lawyers prepare expert summaries...

Read More

Student conduct interdicted: General discretion?

by | Oct 20, 2016 | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 0 |

Hotz v University of Cape Town (730/2016) [2016] ZASCA 159 (20 October 2016) per Wallis JA (Navsa, Bosielo, Theron and Mathopo JJA concurring) Earlier this year UCT obtained a far-reaching final interdict from the high court...

Read More
Loading