Uniform Rule 28 Archives

Refusing eviction application: Procedurally and substantively flawed

by GilesFiles | Jan 16, 2025 | 2020 onwards, Applications, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Costs, Courts, Declaratory, Eviction/ejectment, Evidence & onus, General, HC Uniform, High Court, High Court judges, Interdicts & rules, Interpretation etc, Joinder, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Legal Practice, Legislation, Orders, Parties, Private enterprises, Refused, Refused, Rules Codes & Manual, SDJ Wilson, Sectors, Statutory, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Claim statement amended: Pre-trial minute?

by GilesFiles | Dec 8, 2022 | 2020 onwards, Applications, Causes and defences, Contractual breach, Costs, Courts, Declaratory, Evidence & onus, General, Granted, HC Uniform, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Court, Labour Court judges, Labour Relations, LC Rules-old, Legal Practice, LRA 07: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 1995, LRA D: 151-166 LC, Mining, Minute: pre-trial or arb, Orders, Parties, Pleadings: amending, Private enterprises, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Lifestyle centres considered: Domestic or business?

by GilesFiles | Nov 11, 2022 | 2020 onwards, Applications, BC and HOAs, Causes and defences, Community schemes, Costs awarded, Courts, Declaratory, Evidence & onus, HC Uniform, High Court, High Court judges, Judges, Legal Practice, Legislation, Orders, Parties, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Statutory, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Mandatory interdict considered: Resultant harm?

by GilesFiles | Mar 15, 2021 | 2020 onwards, A G Binns-Ward, Applications, Causes and defences, Courts, Declaratory, Evidence & onus, Exceptions/special pleas, General, High Court, High Court judges, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Legal Practice, Orders, Pleadings: amending, Special pleas, Topics | 0 |

Racing Park development Owners Association v Cape Killarney Property Investments (Pty) Ltd High court considered the nature of the relief sought which was a mandatory interdict involving a remedy where positive conduct on the...

Res judicata examined: Issue estoppel included

by GilesFiles | Oct 24, 2019 | 2019, 2019, Agriculture, Appeals, Causes and defences, ConCourt judges, Constitutional Court, Courts, Edwin Cameron, Exceptions/special pleas, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Landmark judgments, Legal Practice, Legislation, Res judicata (issue estoppel), Sectors, SV Khampepe, Topics | 0 |

Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Ltd v Merck Sharpe Dohme Corporation Res judicata examined and Constitutional Court failed to achieve a majority decision which meant that the judgment of the high court was not overturned. ...

Tag: Uniform Rule 28

Refusing eviction application: Procedurally and substantively flawed

Claim statement amended: Pre-trial minute?

Lifestyle centres considered: Domestic or business?

Mandatory interdict considered: Resultant harm?

Res judicata examined: Issue estoppel included