PAJA 9 Archives - GilesFiles

Examining settlement agreement: Absence of concurrence

by GilesFiles | Dec 2, 2024 | 2020 onwards, Allowed, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Causes and defences, Central, Contractual breach, Courts, Declaratory, DN Unterhalter, Government, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Legal Practice, Legislation, Orders, Parties, Review tests, SCA judges, Sectors, State organs, Statutory, Supreme Court of Appeal, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Exercising public power: Legal thresholds not met

by GilesFiles | Mar 26, 2024 | 2020 onwards, Applications, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Central, Condonation, Costs, Courts, Declaratory, Direct and indirect discrimination, Evidence & onus, Government, High Court, High Court judges, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Legislation, Orders, PAJA 2000, Parties, Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, State organs, Statutory, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Varying assessment tariff: split decision re condonation

by GilesFiles | Feb 29, 2024 | 2020 onwards, A G Binns-Ward, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Causes and defences, Central, Costs, Courts, Disallowed, Government, High Court, High Court judges, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Legal Practice, Legislation, Orders, Parties, Private enterprises, Public Protector, Sectors, Selected judges, State organs, Statutory, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Municipal manager appointments: Mootness

by GilesFiles | Nov 21, 2019 | 2019, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Bill of Rights, Common law, ConCourt judges, Constitutional Court, Courts, Disallowed, HC Uniform, JC Froneman, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Legislation, Municipal, Municipal managers, Orders, PAJA 2000, Parties, Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, State, Topics | 0 |

Notyawa v Makana Municipality Municipal manager appointments examined and found that leave to appeal had to be refused because in the concurring judgment of Froneman J the issues were already moot and no purpose would be...

Municipal manager appointments: Leave refused

by GilesFiles | Nov 21, 2019 | 2019, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Bill of Rights, Common law, ConCourt judges, Constitutional Court, Costs, Courts, Disallowed, Government, HC Uniform, JC Froneman, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Legislation, Municipal, Municipal managers, Orders, PAJA 2000, Parties, Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Topics | 0 |

Notyawa v Makana Municipality Municipal manager appointments examined and found that leave to appeal had to be refused because there were no prospects of success and the discretion had been properly exercised by the high ...

Tag: PAJA 9

Examining settlement agreement: Absence of concurrence

Exercising public power: Legal thresholds not met

Varying assessment tariff: split decision re condonation

Municipal manager appointments: Mootness

Municipal manager appointments: Leave refused