Tag: MR 21

Compromise erroneously concluded: Ultra vires statute

Z v Body Corporate of Selma Court Compromise erroneously concluded because the language used in section 3(1)(c) of the STSMA “imposes a positive obligation on the body corporate to collect levies and contributions – the...

Read More

Levy clearance certificate: Dissent – refusal to issue?

Body Corporate Marsh Rose v Steinmuller The dissenting judgment in dealing with the issue of a levy clearance certificate was of the view that “the real issue in this appeal is whether a Body Corporate can be compelled to...

Read More

Levy clearance certificate: Refusal to issue?

Body Corporate Marsh Rose v Steinmuller By a majority decision a full bench of the high court decided that the body corporate could not refuse to issue a levy clearance certificate because inter alia the liability for levies is...

Read More

Levy clearance certificate: Refusal to issue?

Body Corporate Marsh Rose v Steinmuller By a majority decision a full bench of the high court decided that the body corporate could not refuse to issue a levy clearance certificate because inter alia the liability for levies is...

Read More
Loading