Trollip J Archives - GilesFiles

Double-barrelled approach: Appeal and review

by GilesFiles | Sep 4, 2020 | 2020 onwards, A G Binns-Ward, Appeals, BC and HOAs, Body C Conduct, Common law, Community schemes, Courts, Declaratory, High Court, High Court judges, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Legal Practice, Orders, Parties, Review tests, Sectors, Thresholds, Topics | 0 |

Kingshaven Homeowners’ Association v Botha In considering an appeal against the refusal of an adjudicator in an application in terms of the CSOS Act the High Court discussed the merits of appeal and review and recommended...

Appealing with leave: Under what circumstances

by GilesFiles | Dec 13, 2019 | 2019, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Common law, Courts, Disallowed, Judges, Legal Practice, Legislation, MJD Wallis, Orders, Review tests, SCA judges, Sectors, Supreme Court of Appeal, Topics | 0 |

National Credit Regulator v Lewis Stores (Pty) Ltd Appealing with leave considered by SCA and appeal from the decision of a high court under s 148(2)(b) lies with leave of that court sitting as a court of first instance....

Appeal powers analysed: Essentially 3 types

by GilesFiles | Mar 28, 1963 | 2014 and earlier, Allowed, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Causes and defences, Common law, Courts, Declaratory, Fair procedure, General, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Legal Practice, Orders, Parties, Review tests, SCA judges, Statutory, Supreme Court of Appeal, Termination (LRL 8), Topics | 0 |

Tikly v Johannes NO Justice Trollip analysed appeal powers and pointed out that the word “appeal” can have three different connotations and stressed that the sense in which “appeal” is used in any particular matter...

Tag: Trollip J

Double-barrelled approach: Appeal and review

Appealing with leave: Under what circumstances

Appeal powers analysed: Essentially 3 types