Murray Archives - GilesFiles

Fair dealing implied: Employment terms implied?

by GilesFiles | Mar 3, 2010 | 2014 and earlier, 2015 and earlier, Allowed, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Conduct & capacity, Courts, Declaratory, Dignity equality freedom, Exceptions/special pleas, General, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Labour Relations, Landmark judgments, Lawfulness & fairness, Legal Practice, Legality principle, LRA 07: 112-184 Dispute, LRA 08a: 185-197B Dismissal, LRA 1995, MJD Wallis, Orders, Review tests, Roman Dutch law, SCA judges, Special pleas, Statutes (LRL 2)-work, Supreme Court of Appeal, Termination (LRL 8), Terms & conditions, Topics, Trust & confidence | 0 |

On 15 February 2010 MJD Wallis AJA delivered a landmark judgment in SA Maritime Safety Authority (SAMSA) v McKenzie; [2010] 5 BLLR 488 ; (2010) ILJ 529 (SCA) (17/09) [2010] ZASCA 2. Multiple causes of action based on the...

Tag: Murray

Fair dealing implied: Employment terms implied?