executive action Archives

Negotiating right to deadlock: Administrative or executive action?

by GilesFiles | Jun 12, 2025 | 2020 onwards, Appeals, Appeals - leave, Bill of Rights, Central, Contractual breach, Costs, Courts, Declaratory, Disallowed, Government, Interpretation etc, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Legal Practice, Legality principle, Orders, PAJA 2000, Parties, Private enterprises, Res judicata (issue estoppel), Roman Dutch law, SCA judges, Sectors, Special pleas, State organs, Supreme Court of Appeal, Topics | 0 |

For subscribers only Whilst some judgment summaries are available to all, this judgment summary is reserved for subscribers only. If you are already a subscriber, you can login to see this judgment summary. If you cannot login,...

Executive decisions considered: Interests of justice

by GilesFiles | Sep 18, 2019 | 2019, Bill of Rights, Causes and defences, Central, Common law, ConCourt judges, Constitutional Court, Courts, Exceptions/special pleas, HC Uniform, Judges, Jurisdiction & powers, Legal Practice, MTR Mogoeng, philosophy / economics, Review tests, Rules Codes & Manual, Sectors, Topics | 0 |

President of RSA v Democratic Alliance Executive decisions considered and constitutional court refused to advise or guide the president courts should be “loath to fulfil an advisory role, particularly for the benefit of...

Accountability and good governance: ConCourt judgment

by GilesFiles | Jun 10, 2014 | 2014 and earlier, 2015 and earlier, Causes and defences, Constitutional Court, Courts, Edwin Cameron, JC Froneman, Jurisdiction & powers, Landmark judgments, Legality principle, Retired judges, Words & phrases | 0 |

Today the Constitutional Court delivered an important judgment dealing with the exercise of executive power and the setting of performance standards for the leadership of state‑owned entities. The judgment concerns the...

Tag: executive action

Negotiating right to deadlock: Administrative or executive action?

Executive decisions considered: Interests of justice

Accountability and good governance: ConCourt judgment